Commonly　there　are　two　structure　types　for　the　concrete　structure　with　isolation　on　the　first　floor　column　top,　the　one　with　frame　column　and　straining　beam　and　the　one　with　independent　column.In　order　to　validate　the　safety　of　this　type　of　structure　and　give　suggestion　on　selecting　the　structure　type　of　the　bottom　floor,　a　shaking　table　test　was　carried　out.By　taken　into　account　the　two　structural　on　the　bottom　floor,　the　acceleration　and　displacement　responses　are　analyzed　when　subjected　to　different　seismic　loads　with　different　amplitudes,　especially　for　the　different　seismic　response　of　the　bottom　structure.The　test　model　is　derived　from　a　typical　across　horizontal　frame　of　a　practical　structure.Two　types　of　the　isolated　scaled　models,　as　well　as　the　aseismic　scaled　model　are　built　for　a　comparative　study.The　test　results　show　that　for　both　isolated　models,　the　reduction　of　the　acceleration　and　displacement　responses　on　top　of　the　models　is　remarkable.Poor　control　effectiveness　is　observed　for　the　acceleration　responses　on　the　bottom　floor,　while　the　reduction　on　the　displacement　responses　is　obvious.These　results　indicate　that　if　this　kinds　of　bottom　story　capital　isolation　structure　is　designed　according　to　the　Chinese　code　GB　50011-2010,　the　aseismic　safety　can　be　guaranteed　even　under　severe　earthquake　inputs.The　numerical　results　show　that　the　independent　column　will　induce　a　large　elastic-plastic　deformation　when　the　stiffness　of　the　bottom　column　is　reduced　to　the　same　value　of　the　aseismic　model.It　is　also　proved　that　the　frame　column　with　straining　beam　is　more　effective　on　improving　the　control　effectiveness　of　bottom　story　drift　than　the　independent　column　scheme.If　independent　column　structure　is　chosen　in　practical　project　application,　the　stiffness　of　the　column　should　be　increased　to　some　extent.　©　2017,　The　Editorial　Board　of　Journal　of　Basic　Science　and　Engineering.　All　right　reserved.