• Complex
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
  • Scholars
  • Journal
  • ISSN
  • Conference
成果搜索

author:

Qi, J. (Qi, J..) [1] | Zhang, X. (Zhang, X..) [2] | Wang, Q. (Wang, Q..) [3]

Indexed by:

Scopus

Abstract:

Freeze-thaw cycles are important processes relevant to terrestrial hydrological cycling. However, the representation of freeze-thaw cycles has been often simplified in large scale watershed models. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), which has been widely used to understand and assess hydrologic budgets and water resources management, employs a simplified empirical approach to estimate soil temperature and determine the freezing and thawing status of soils. Here, we compared the performance of a physically-based soil temperature module and the built-in empirical approach in SWAT against field measurements at surface and 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 cm depths at six stations of the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) within the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB). In general, SWAT consistently underestimated winter soil temperatures and overestimated frozen days at all soil depths, while the modified version of SWAT (equipped with the physically-based soil temperature model; referred to as TSWAT) pronouncedly reduced the bias in estimated winter soil temperatures and frozen days compared with SWAT. Model performance assessment is conducted with three statistical coefficients, i.e., Bias (°C), the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NS). Statistical analyses show that TSWAT accurately simulated surface and soil temperatures at the five depths with R 2 and NS values greater than 0.82 at most sites, and Bias values were generally within the range of −1 to 1 °C during winter and ranged between −2.09 and 2.58 °C in non-winter seasons. The differences in freeze-thaw cycle representation between SWAT and TSWAT translate into noticeable discrepancies in simulated key hydrologic variables, such as surface runoff, percolation, and baseflow. Compared against long-term observed streamflow (1980–2015), TSWAT outperformed SWAT in capturing variations in monthly streamflow in both winter and non-winter seasons. These results and analyses highlight the value of improving freeze-thaw cycle representation for enhanced hydrologic modeling in large watersheds that are subject to freeze-thaw cycles. © 2019

Keyword:

Freeze-thaw cycles; Soil temperature; Streamflow; SWAT

Community:

  • [ 1 ] [Qi, J.]Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, 5825 University Research Ct, College Park, MD 20740, United States
  • [ 2 ] [Zhang, X.]Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, 5825 University Research Ct, College Park, MD 20740, United States
  • [ 3 ] [Zhang, X.]Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, United States
  • [ 4 ] [Wang, Q.]College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China

Reprint 's Address:

  • [Zhang, X.]Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, 5825 University Research Ct, United States

Show more details

Related Keywords:

Related Article:

Source :

Journal of Hydrology

ISSN: 0022-1694

Year: 2019

Volume: 571

Page: 605-618

4 . 5

JCR@2019

5 . 9 0 0

JCR@2023

ESI HC Threshold:150

JCR Journal Grade:1

CAS Journal Grade:1

Cited Count:

WoS CC Cited Count:

SCOPUS Cited Count: 32

ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All

WanFang Cited Count:

Chinese Cited Count:

30 Days PV: 0

Affiliated Colleges:

Online/Total:357/10788936
Address:FZU Library(No.2 Xuyuan Road, Fuzhou, Fujian, PRC Post Code:350116) Contact Us:0591-22865326
Copyright:FZU Library Technical Support:Beijing Aegean Software Co., Ltd. 闽ICP备05005463号-1