The　recently　proposed　RCube　network　is　a　cube-based　server-centric　data　center　network　(DCN),　including　two　types　of　heterogeneous　servers,　called　core　servers　and　edge　servers.　Remarkably,　it　takes　the　latter　as　backup　servers　to　deal　with　server　failures　and　thus　achieve　high　availability.　This　paper　first　points　out　that　RCube　is　suitable　as　a　candidate　topology　of　DCNs　for　edge　computing.　Three　transmission　types　are　among　core　and　edge　servers　based　on　the　demand　for　applications＇　computation　and　instant　response.　We　then　employ　protection　routing　to　analyze　the　transmission　failure　of　RCube　DCNs.　Unlike　traditional　protection　routing,　which　only　tolerates　a　single　link　or　node　failure,　we　use　the　multi-protection　routing　scheme　to　improve　fault-tolerance　capability.　To　configure　a　protection　routing　in　a　network,　according　to　Tapolcai＇s　suggestion,　we　need　to　construct　two　completely　independent　spanning　trees　(CISTs),　which　are　edge-disjoint　and　inner-vertex-disjoint　spanning　trees.　It　is　well-known　that　the　problem　of　determining　whether　there　exists　a　dual-CIST　(i.e.,　two　CISTs)　in　a　network　is　NP-complete.　A　logic　graph　of　RCube,　denoted　by　L-RCube(n,m,k),　is　a　network　with　a　recursive　structure.　Each　basic　building　element　consists　of　n　core　servers　and　m　edge　servers,　where　the　order　k　is　the　number　of　recursions　applied　in　the　structure.　In　this　paper,　we　provide　algorithms　to　construct　min{n,L(n+m)/2　RIGHT　FLOOR}　CISTs　in　L-RCube(n,m,k)　for　n+m　＞=　slant　4　and　n＞1.　From　a　combination　of　the　multiple　CISTs,　we　can　configure　the　desired　multi-protection　routing.　In　our　simulation,　we　configure　up　to　10　protection　routings　for　RCube　DCNs.　As　far　as　we　know,　in　past　research,　there　were　at　most　three　protection　routings　developed　in　other　network　structures.　Finally,　we　summarize　some　crucial　analysis　viewpoints　about　the　transmission　efficiency　of　DCNs　with　heterogeneous　edge-core　servers　from　the　simulation　results.