• Complex
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
  • Scholars
  • Journal
  • ISSN
  • Conference
成果搜索

author:

Li, Xiaoyu (Li, Xiaoyu.) [1] | Zhang, Lirong (Zhang, Lirong.) [2] | Zhou, Lifeng (Zhou, Lifeng.) [3] | Liu, Jian (Liu, Jian.) [4] | Zhou, Meng (Zhou, Meng.) [5] | Lin, Zhengyu (Lin, Zhengyu.) [6] | Luo, Min (Luo, Min.) [7] | Zhang, Baohua (Zhang, Baohua.) [8] | Xiao, Leilei (Xiao, Leilei.) [9]

Indexed by:

EI

Abstract:

Currently, microplastic pollution poses a great threat to diverse ecosystems. Microplastics can potentially change soil characteristics and impact soil microorganisms, and then affect the production of CO2, CH4 and other greenhouse gases. However, experimental study on different ecological soils is lacking. Herein, we experimentally analyzed the CO2 and CH4 production potential affected by four types of microplastics in freshwater (Poyang Lake in Jiangxi province, paddy soil in Hunan province) and saltwater (Salt marsh in Shandong province, mangrove soil in Fujian province) ecosystems. Microplastics promoted CO2 production, of which polyethylene terephthalate (PET) had the greatest impact. In our study, the microplastics that had the greatest impact on CH4 concentration emissions were high-density polyethylene (1276 umol·g−1·L−1), followed by polyvinyl chloride (384 umol·g−1·L−1), polyethylene terephthalate (198 umol·g−1·L−1), and polyamide (134 umol·g−1·L−1). In addition, the largest impact on CO2 concentration emissions was displayed by polyethylene terephthalate (2253 umol·g−1·L−1), followed by polyvinyl chloride (2194 umol·g−1·L−1), polyamide (2006 umol·g−1·L−1), and high-density polyethylene (1522 umol·g−1·L−1). However, the analysis results based on one-way ANOVA showed that CO2 emission was most significantly affected by soil properties rather than microplastics types. In comparison, the influencing factor on CH4 production changed from soil types to the interaction between soil types and microplastics, and finally to the microplastics with the increase in incubation time. Further, by comparing CO2 and CH4 production and Global Warming Equivalent (GWE) affected by microplastics, freshwater ecosystems were more sensitive than saltwater. For all the soil types used in this study, high-density polyethylene had the greatest impact on CH4 production potential. In conclusion, our study provided basic data for further understanding the effects of microplastics on soil greenhouse gas emissions from different sources. © 2022 by the authors.

Keyword:

Carbon dioxide Chlorine compounds Ecosystems Gas emissions Global warming Greenhouse gases Microplastic Plastic bottles Polyvinyl chlorides Soils Water

Community:

  • [ 1 ] [Li, Xiaoyu]School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng; 252059, China
  • [ 2 ] [Li, Xiaoyu]CAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai; 264003, China
  • [ 3 ] [Zhang, Lirong]CAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai; 264003, China
  • [ 4 ] [Zhang, Lirong]Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, China Academy of Sciences, Dongying; 257000, China
  • [ 5 ] [Zhang, Lirong]Shandong Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes, Yantai; 264003, China
  • [ 6 ] [Zhou, Lifeng]School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng; 252059, China
  • [ 7 ] [Zhou, Lifeng]CAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai; 264003, China
  • [ 8 ] [Liu, Jian]Shandong Key Laboratory of Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou; 253023, China
  • [ 9 ] [Zhou, Meng]Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin; 150081, China
  • [ 10 ] [Lin, Zhengyu]Shandong Key Laboratory of Biophysics, Institute of Biophysics, Dezhou University, Dezhou; 253023, China
  • [ 11 ] [Luo, Min]College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou; 350116, China
  • [ 12 ] [Zhang, Baohua]School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng; 252059, China
  • [ 13 ] [Xiao, Leilei]CAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai; 264003, China
  • [ 14 ] [Xiao, Leilei]Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, China Academy of Sciences, Dongying; 257000, China
  • [ 15 ] [Xiao, Leilei]Shandong Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes, Yantai; 264003, China

Reprint 's Address:

Email:

Show more details

Related Keywords:

Source :

Atmosphere

Year: 2022

Issue: 11

Volume: 13

2 . 9

JCR@2022

2 . 5 0 0

JCR@2023

ESI HC Threshold:51

JCR Journal Grade:3

CAS Journal Grade:4

Cited Count:

WoS CC Cited Count:

SCOPUS Cited Count: 5

ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All

WanFang Cited Count:

Chinese Cited Count:

30 Days PV: 0

Affiliated Colleges:

Online/Total:144/10048827
Address:FZU Library(No.2 Xuyuan Road, Fuzhou, Fujian, PRC Post Code:350116) Contact Us:0591-22865326
Copyright:FZU Library Technical Support:Beijing Aegean Software Co., Ltd. 闽ICP备05005463号-1