Indexed by:
Abstract:
In this study, we investigated the application risks of oxalic acid, a classic mobilizing agent, by examining arsenic (As) fractionation/ speciation, leachability, and oral bioavailability/ bioaccessibility. Advanced methodologies, including the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure and both in vivo and in vitro tests, were employed. The results revealed that oxalic acid significantly enhanced the mobility of arsenic in terms of fractionation. The proportion of labile arsenic (As) fractions, comprising the water-soluble and exchangeable fractions, increased by 1. 85 times following mobilization. Concurrently, the combined proportion of amorphous and crystalline As was significantly reduced. This led to a marked increase in the ecological risk associated with soil As, with leachability rising by an average of 3. 59 times. Notably, in both in vivo and in vitro tests, oxalic acid was found to reduce the health risks posed by arsenic. In the mouse model, oxalic acid significantly decreased the relative bioavailability of arsenic (As). Using the PBET - SHIME model, we observed that oxalic acid notably reduced As bioavailability during the colon phase. Additionally, oxalic acid inhibited the reduction of bioaccessible As(Ⅴ) and promoted the methylation of bioaccessible As(III), which is associated with higher toxicity in colon fluid, thereby further mitigating health risks. The observed phenomena can primarily be attributed to the release of excessive metal components from the soil due to oxalic acid and the metabolism of oxalic acid by gut microbiota. Notably, consistent trends were observed across all soil samples following the application of oxalic acid, highlighting the generalizability of its effects on soil arsenic (As). In summary, as a typical low-molecular-weight organic acid, oxalic acid is highly recommended for the mobilization and remediation of As-contaminated soils. This study provides valuable scientific information for selecting mobilizing agents for As-contaminated soils and serves as a reference for risk control at remediation sites. © 2025 Science China Press. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Reprint 's Address:
Email:
Source :
Journal of Safety and Environment
ISSN: 1009-6094
Year: 2025
Issue: 8
Volume: 25
Page: 2885-2895
Cited Count:
SCOPUS Cited Count:
ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All
WanFang Cited Count:
Chinese Cited Count:
30 Days PV: 1
Affiliated Colleges: