Query：
学者姓名：何郁冰
Refining：
Year
Type
Indexed by
Source
Complex
Former Name
Co-
Language
Clean All
Abstract ：
基于创新采用的分析框架,从创新的相对性出发,提出了一种同时满足创新的内部特征和外部特征的颠覆性技术识别方法.首先,分别使用BERTopic主题模型、专利信息挖掘技术获取新技术功能、不连续的技术标准,识别颠覆性技术的创新内部特征;其次,使用CD指数衡量专利的颠覆性潜力,识别颠覆性技术的创新外部特征;然后,识别出同时满足创新内部和外部特征的颠覆性技术,划分出新市场、低端和高端的颠覆性技术;最后,以储能领域专利为例,验证识别方法的可行性和有效性.该方法能将颠覆性技术的定义与识别进行匹配,体现出技术创新和市场采纳的相互作用,区分不同类型的颠覆性技术,为企业确定一项新技术是否产生颠覆性影响提供了参考.
Keyword ：
BERTopic BERTopic CD指数 CD指数 专利文本挖掘 专利文本挖掘 创新采用 创新采用 颠覆性技术识别 颠覆性技术识别
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 徐美娟 , 荆晶 . 基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究 [J]. | 科学学研究 , 2025 , 43 (1) : 66-78 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 等. "基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究" . | 科学学研究 43 . 1 (2025) : 66-78 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 徐美娟 , 荆晶 . 基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究 . | 科学学研究 , 2025 , 43 (1) , 66-78 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
颠覆性创新是企业实现追赶的重要手段,对企业获得持久竞争优势具有重要指导意义.针对现有研究呈现分散、矛盾的现状,通过文献计量和内容分析,对1995-2022年国内外颠覆性创新文献进行分析,并构建包括核心内涵、研究视角和研究方法的知识框架,归纳热点问题和规律.研究发现颠覆性创新研究发文量呈稳步上升态势,但与国外相比国内文献数量与其差距逐渐增大且机构间合作较少;国内外研究热点主题具有较大共性,重点集中在技术识别、影响因素和模式机制,但在研究问题侧重上存在差异.此外,颠覆性创新概念边界模糊,可从特征、结果、过程多角度定义;研究视角主要围绕技术、组织、战略、市场展开;研究方法则以案例研究为主,逐渐向多种定量方法扩展.
Keyword ：
文献计量 文献计量 演进 演进 知识框架 知识框架 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架 [J]. | 技术经济与管理研究 , 2025 , (1) : 15-22 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 等. "国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架" . | 技术经济与管理研究 1 (2025) : 15-22 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架 . | 技术经济与管理研究 , 2025 , (1) , 15-22 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
Based on the perspective of ecological efficiency, this paper divides the innovation process of industrial innovation ecosystem into three stages: Assimilation, growth and utilization, and constructs an evaluation index system of industrial innovation ecosystem efficiency. The Super-SBM model and Malmquist index method are used to measure the innovation ecosystem efficiency of 15 high-tech industries in China, and relevant efficiency improvement paths are proposed. The research results show that the efficiency of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem is at a medium level, with an overall trend of continuous growth. The differences and polarization among industries are significant, and further coordinated development is needed. There are significant differences in the efficiency of the three stages, with the highest utilization efficiency, the second highest growth efficiency and the lowest assimilation efficiency. In the evolutionary trend, the assimilation efficiency has the fastest growth rate, utilization efficiency is the second, and growth efficiency is the slowest (negative growth). Combined with the difference of industrial efficiency in different stages, it is found that the 'double three-high' efficiency industry has not yet formed, which cannot play the leading and promoting role of 'innovation ecological effect'. The efficiency of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem can be characterized by four types: high efficiency - fast growth, low efficiency - fast growth, low efficiency - slow growth, and high efficiency - slow growth. Different types of industries can improve the efficiency of innovation ecosystem through process optimization, mechanism improvement, and bilateral breakthrough. © 2024 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
Ecosystems Ecosystems Efficiency Efficiency Optimization Optimization
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Yubing , Zhang, Si , Lin, Ting . Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path [J]. | System Engineering Theory and Practice , 2024 , 44 (2) : 546-562 . |
| MLA | He, Yubing 等. "Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path" . | System Engineering Theory and Practice 44 . 2 (2024) : 546-562 . |
| APA | He, Yubing , Zhang, Si , Lin, Ting . Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path . | System Engineering Theory and Practice , 2024 , 44 (2) , 546-562 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
在创新生态系统情境下,生态系统合法性的获取及演化是创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新的有效机制.通过对迈新1993-2023年的纵向案例分析发现,创业企业通过生态系统合法性实现颠覆性创新的过程,实际上是创业企业围绕颠覆性的价值主张构建创新生态系统,并不断克服各种生态系统合法性障碍,逐步得到创新生态系统内外部行动者的理解和认可,最终实现对现有生态系统价值主张的颠覆或部分替代的过程.在此期间,生态系统合法性经历了"规范""认知"和"价值"维度的演化,并依次通过"行为""话语"和"意义"合法化策略获取相应的合法性.研究结论对于创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新具有重要见解.
Keyword ：
创业企业 创业企业 创新生态系统 创新生态系统 生态系统合法性 生态系统合法性 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 et al. 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? [J]. | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新?" . | 科学学研究 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 , 林齐心 . 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? . | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
政府应如何构建有利于颠覆性技术涌现及创新价值实现的政策环境,推动企业实现颠覆性创新并获得竞争优势,值得深入研究.从强制性制度压力视角探讨政策工具对企业颠覆性创新的影响机理,并基于新能源车企"双积分"政策的准自然实验,运用断点回归开展实证研究.结果表明:①"双积分"政策提高了新能源车企颠覆性创新的概率、数量、占比以及质量;②从机制分析看,"双积分"政策主要通过激励企业增加研发项目、参与技术标准联盟两条路径促进新能源车企颠覆性创新;③异质性分析发现,"双积分"政策对车企颠覆性创新的推动作用在民营企业以及更受媒体关注的企业中更显著.
Keyword ：
"双积分"政策 "双积分"政策 强制性制度压力 强制性制度压力 断点回归 断点回归 新能源汽车产业 新能源汽车产业 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 林婷 . 强制性制度压力对颠覆性创新的影响机理 [J]. | 科技进步与对策 , 2024 , 41 (23) : 29-40 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "强制性制度压力对颠覆性创新的影响机理" . | 科技进步与对策 41 . 23 (2024) : 29-40 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 林婷 . 强制性制度压力对颠覆性创新的影响机理 . | 科技进步与对策 , 2024 , 41 (23) , 29-40 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
PurposeDisruptive innovation is regarded as an important engine of the new technological revolution, which can change the traditional market structure and business model completely. Articles on disruptive innovation remain fragmented and heterogeneous in terms of theoretical paradigms and empirical studies. For the purpose of further understanding about disruptive innovation, and to recognize its evolutionary trajectory and research trends, this paper provides a systematic literature review.Design/methodology/approachBased on data from Web of Science a total of 1,415 articles were collected to identify productive countries, prominent journals, influential authors and main sub-fields on disruptive innovation. Additionally, important articles are analyzed for content.FindingsThere is an overall increasing trend in the number of articles, a uniformity of highly productive authors and countries and a primary concentration in business and management journals. Moreover, six research clusters are identified and an antecedent-decision-outcome framework is constructed to categorize significant studies.Practical implicationsThis paper outlines the key focuses of the field: application and adoption of disruptive technology, identifying and responding to disruptive innovation, commercialization of disruptive technology, disruptive innovation strategies and disruptive business models.Originality/valueThis paper combines bibliometrics and content analysis to systematically overview disruptive innovation research.
Keyword ：
Bibliometric Bibliometric Disruptive innovation Disruptive innovation Intellectual structure Intellectual structure Review Review
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Yubing , Jing, Jing . Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review [J]. | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT , 2024 , 37 (6) : 1382-1402 . |
| MLA | He, Yubing et al. "Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review" . | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT 37 . 6 (2024) : 1382-1402 . |
| APA | He, Yubing , Jing, Jing . Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review . | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT , 2024 , 37 (6) , 1382-1402 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
The emergence of disruptive innovation is an important and highly researched field. In the context of innovation ecosystem, the acquisition and its evolution of ecosystem legitimacy is an effective mechanism for start-ups to successfully carry out disruptive innovation. Prior research has shown that disruptive innovation is a socialized process that involves collaboration and dynamic interaction of multiple actors. Therefore, start-ups usually need to be embedded in a suitable innovation ecosystem for acquiring relevant resources and capabilities, in order to realize disruptive innovation through value co-creation. However, startups that introduce disruptive innovations into an existing ecosystem usually face the liability of newness including customer indifference, incumbent skepticism, and lack of co-specialized assets, which will undermine the efforts and effects of disruptive innovations carried out by start-ups. As a result, in order to successfully carry out disruptive innovation, start-ups usually have to acquire ecosystem legitimacy, that is, to obtain the support from actors inside and outside the ecosystem or even incumbents that may be disrupted. However, it is worth considering that there is currently a lack of relevant research on how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovations through acquiring ecosystem legitimacy. Although the last few years have seen a boom in the study of the relationship between innovation ecosystem and disruptive innovation, most of that are usually based on the assumption that disruptive innovation has already occurred. Existing research focus mainly on the strategic response of incumbents to the challenge of being disrupted, with fewer studies analyzing the ecosystem legitimacy of disruptive innovation carried out by start-ups. Using the method of longitudinal case study, this paper explores the detailed process of how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovation by acquiring the ecosystem legitimacy. According to the principle of theoretical sampling, Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd. was selected as the case study sample. First, Maixin Biotechnology has successfully achieved disruptive innovation and realized the transition from entrepreneur to leader. Second, Maixin Biotechnology has finally disrupted or partially replaced the existing ecosystem value proposition by constructing the ecosystem legitimacy. Moreover, Maixin Biotechnology has greatly enhanced its disruptive innovation capability through the ecological legitimation strategies. Through the longitudinal case analysis of Maixin Biotechnology from 1993 to 2023, this paper finds that Maixin Biotechnology builds an innovation ecosystem around a disruptive value proposition, and constantly overcomes various obstacles to ecosystem legitimacy during this period, so as to gradually get the understanding and recognition of internal and external actors of the ecosystem. By acquiring ecosystem legitimacy, Maixin has ultimately succeeded in disrupting or partially replacing the value proposition of existing innovation ecosystems. In the process of building innovation ecosystems to carry out disruptive innovation, the ecosystem legitimacy construction of start-ups has experienced a dynamic evolution from performative legitimation, cognitive legitimation to value proposition legitimacy. Accordingly, start-ups could acquire ecosystem legitimacy through the phases of behavioral legitimization, discursive legitimation, and meaningful legitimization in that order. This paper introduces the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy which enriches the disruptive innovation theory of start-ups in emerging economies. Based on the context of Chinese startups, this paper proposes a formation path of disruptive innovation through the acquisition of ecosystem legitimacy. This paper not only makes up for the traditional deficiency from the single perspective of incumbents to examine disruptive innovation, but also provides a new mechanism for disruptive innovation of Chinese start-ups. The conclusion has also important enlightenment for the disruptive innovation practice of start-ups in emerging economies and the construction of scientific and technological powerhouse of China. © 2024 Editorial Department of Studies in Science of Science. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
disruptive innovation disruptive innovation ecosystem legitimacy ecosystem legitimacy innovation ecosystem innovation ecosystem start-ups start-ups
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. et al. How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] [J]. | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | He, Y.-B. et al. "How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究]" . | Studies in Science of Science 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. , Lin, Q.-X. . How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] . | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
针对颠覆性技术的侵蚀性与不确定性特征,结合复杂网络与演化博弈理论,设计了基于复杂网络的演化博弈模型,运用计算机仿真方法对颠覆性技术扩散特点进行考察.结果表明,颠覆性技术在新兴企业之间的扩散具有相对稳定性,但对在位企业之间的扩散表现出不可预测性;技术颠覆潜力和侵蚀能力的提高均无法保证颠覆性技术的完全扩散;网络结构特征对颠覆性技术的扩散效果影响显著.
Keyword ：
复杂网络 复杂网络 技术扩散 技术扩散 演化博弈 演化博弈 颠覆性技术 颠覆性技术
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 林欣慧 . 基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究 [J]. | 软科学 , 2024 , 38 (6) : 28-36 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究" . | 软科学 38 . 6 (2024) : 28-36 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 林欣慧 . 基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究 . | 软科学 , 2024 , 38 (6) , 28-36 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
Complementary technologies are argued to be crucial elements for disruptive innovation. This is even truer in the consistent structure of ecosystems surrounding core disruptive innovations, where firms take interdependence as the premise to provide complementary technologies and create value jointly. Existing research at the disruptive innovation-ecosystem intersection spans a wide range of theoretical perspectives. However, it is still inconclusive about what types of complementary technology configurations might be most useful for the firms they collaborate with to create disruptive innovation. In an attempt to address these gaps, we consider diversity, quality, and novelty as distinguishing structural characteristics of complementary technologies. Empirical evidence from the Chinese electric vehicle listed firms from 2010 to 2019 reveals that the diversity, quality, and novelty of complementary technologies within ecosystems all contribute to subsequent disruptive innovation. Furthermore, we find an inverted U-shaped moderating effect of technological relatedness on the relationship between complementary technologies and disruptive innovation. At intermediate levels of technological relatedness, complementary technologies have greater benefits for disruptive innovation but are comparatively weaker when technological relatedness is low or high. Our findings crystallise a nuanced understanding of how firms orchestrate complementary activities within ecosystems in the disruptive innovation process, thus narrowing the gap with the technological frontier.
Keyword ：
Chinese electric vehicle Chinese electric vehicle Complementary technology Complementary technology Disruptive innovation Disruptive innovation Ecosystem Ecosystem Technological relatedness Technological relatedness
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Yubing , Lin, Ting , Zhang, Si . Does complementary technology within an ecosystem affect disruptive innovation? Evidence from Chinese electric vehicle listed firms [J]. | TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY , 2023 , 74 . |
| MLA | He, Yubing et al. "Does complementary technology within an ecosystem affect disruptive innovation? Evidence from Chinese electric vehicle listed firms" . | TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY 74 (2023) . |
| APA | He, Yubing , Lin, Ting , Zhang, Si . Does complementary technology within an ecosystem affect disruptive innovation? Evidence from Chinese electric vehicle listed firms . | TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY , 2023 , 74 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
随着市场需求及外部环境的快速变化,企业需管理和组合自身拥有的各项技术资源,并重视通过外部途径获取知识,拓展企业技术范围,以推进持续创新.本文基于知识协同角度,探讨企业从内部和外部开展技术多元化战略如何影响组织间知识协同,进而作用于创新持续性.结果表明:①内部和外部技术多元化均对企业创新持续性有显著的正向影响;②知识协同的不同维度在技术多元化与企业创新持续性之间的关系中都起到部分中介作用;③协调整合能力对外部技术多元化与企业创新持续性之间的关系有显著的正向调节效应.
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 邹雅颖 , 左霖锋 . 技术多元化、组织间知识协同与企业创新持续性的关系 [J]. | 技术经济 , 2021 , 40 (6) : 47-58 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "技术多元化、组织间知识协同与企业创新持续性的关系" . | 技术经济 40 . 6 (2021) : 47-58 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 邹雅颖 , 左霖锋 . 技术多元化、组织间知识协同与企业创新持续性的关系 . | 技术经济 , 2021 , 40 (6) , 47-58 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Export
| Results： |
Selected to |
| Format： |
